[HamWAN PSDR] VOTE: Gold Mtn uplink dish

[Bart Kus]

Can anyone cite the law here?  I heard Cory mention this, but didn't 
read the actual law.  I'm curious what the meeting attendance 
requirements are.  Do you need > 50% of board to be present, 100%, or 
some other number?

I designed the decision making process so it wouldn't require everyone 
to be present.  Perhaps we need to change the constitution to endow 
board members with officer rights and turn spending decisions into 
non-board business.

--Bart


On 7/23/2015 12:24 PM, Tom Hayward wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rob Salsgiver <rob at nr3o.com> wrote:
>> Gotcha... I just saw "vote" in the title of the email and the brain ran from there...
> There's a simple (well, not really that simple) explanation for that.
> HamWAN's constitution stipulates that votes for spending must be in
> the form of an email to this mailing list. Recently we were made aware
> of a Washington state law that requires board members be able to hear
> each other's votes. To satisfy both requirements, you'll see an email
> like this one announcing a vote, and later the board will hold a
> conference call to formally approve the spending. Eventually HamWAN's
> constitution will be updated in accordance with the law.
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr