[HamWAN PSDR] VOTE: New site @ East Tiger Mountain - phase 1
Bart Kus
me at bartk.us
Tue May 19 14:57:26 PDT 2015
Neither waveguard nor the modems show as having any stock @ Streakwave.
I'm looking at a May 30th 2nd trip to deploy.
--Bart
On 05/19/2015 01:46 PM, Ryan Elliott Turner wrote:
> My streakwave account rep just informed me for their waveguards:
> "The Wav Guard kits by Kam Fab are backordered and we have no ETA for
> new stock. Minimum ETA at this point is 6-8 weeks."
>
> Bummer. We can still save some money moving the RB912UAG-5HPnD to
> Streakwave most likely, but not quite as much.
>
> Also, interestingly enough, we in Memphis are ordering 2 sectors at
> some point today/tomorrow. I wonder if in the future we should
> coordinate and try to consolidate orders to work on discounts.
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Ryan Elliott Turner
> <ryan.e.t at gmail.com <mailto:ryan.e.t at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose that we consolidate and purchase more from
> Streakwave. Move the waveguard and RB912UAG-5HPnD to them. Right
> now, with shipping those cost $293.81 in your proposal. The quote
> I got from them including shipping is about a monthly member's fee
> cheaper. I'll forward to the board.
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Bart Kus <me at bartk.us
> <mailto:me at bartk.us>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm pleased to announce we have installed a working link to
> East Tiger Mountain @ 3000ft ASL (47.488198°, -121.946706°).
>
> The uplink is coming from the Tukwila datacenter and is just
> using single-polarization hardware right now because it was on
> hand. We should upgrade this link hardware to dual polarity,
> but I'd like to wait until the Ubiquity IsoBeam product hits
> the market before we do that. The present performance is
> acceptable at about 50Mbit average. So this link upgrade is
> being skipped in the phase 1 spend here.
>
> We have also recently replaced the Westin router with a
> virtualized router that offers far greater performance, so I
> was able to re-use the RB2011 hardware from the Westin to run
> ETiger. This spend doesn't need to happen at this site. Yay
> re-use!
>
> I would like to try linking ETiger with the Snohomish DEM
> ("Paine") site. Since the viability of this link is unknown,
> I think we should do a test using hardware on-hand. If the
> test shows the signals are good, I'll roll the proper hardware
> request into a phase 2 spend.
>
> We do need to get Sector 3 installed up there though. It
> would be immediately useful, and would replace our Mirrormont
> site, which is only 1500ft ASL, and has much slower
> connectivity. Here are all the parts to make Sector 3 happen:
>
> *Description**
> * *Price**
> * *Qty**
> * *Subtotal**
> *
> AM-5G19-120 sector antenna @ Streakwave
> $117.00
> 1
> $117.00
> Streakwave Shipping
> $23.19
> 1
> $23.19
> RF Element SBX-S-CC-2SMA shielding outdoor radio enclosure @
> ISP Supplies
> $35.90
> 1
> $35.90
> WaveGuard AM5G19 RF shield @ ISP Supplies
> $44.99
> 1
> $44.99
> ISP Supplies Shipping
> $24.89
> 1
> $24.89
> RB912UAG-5HPnD modem @ Baltic Networks
> $69.00
> 1
> $69.00
> Baltic Networks Shipping
> $14.74
> 1
> $14.74
> Mounting hardware @ local stores
> $80.00
> 1
> $80.00
> GRAND TOTAL
>
>
> $409.71
>
>
> I'm including 2 antenna mounts in the mounting hardware
> category. One for the sector, and one for the test link to
> SnoDEM.
>
> We'll also need to find a special short-depth server to use @
> ETiger. I've been doing some research on this but haven't
> found anything appropriate yet. Let me know if you have
> something or know of something cheap that still provides
> remote KVM with virtual media support. All the racks @ ETiger
> are two-post with very little depth available, so normal
> servers won't work.
>
> Our present cash balance is about $340. If you recall the
> last spend request (for the 900MHz test project), I was able
> to save some money by borrowing the expensive antenna hardware
> instead of buying it. We only purchased the two 900MHz
> MikroTik modems, and we also have two Ubiquiti 900MHz modems
> on loan so we can do true A/B testing. This testing will
> likely use the Mirrormont site, although SnoDEM would be
> preferred.
>
> Board, please vote on this spend request. Mailing list
> members, feel free to comment before the board votes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Bart
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org <mailto:PSDR at hamwan.org>
> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ryan Turner
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ryan Turner
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20150519/dbbe79fe/attachment.html>
More information about the PSDR
mailing list