[HamWAN PSDR] Metal 5SHPN Network Help

[Tom Hayward]

Rob,

When you and I were talking about this, the point I was trying to make is,
why stop at one? Why do you only want HamWAN on the site router? It's no
problem to give you as many addresses as you need to cover all the devices
at the site. For instance, we have EOCs with a full public /24 dedicated to
end-user devices. There's no need to NAT; we have plenty of addresses
available. The benefit of this, in the long run, is that people can add
devices in the EOC, hospital, etc., and not have to request port forwarding
for apps that require it. We set up the /24 once and then don't have to
make changes every time someone wants to add an Echolink node. It just
works.

Tom

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Rob Salsgiver <rob at nr3o.com> wrote:

> Cory,
> This is pretty much the question I had brought up after working with Tom I
> think when bringing up the Monroe hospital.  All I was looking for was to
> expose the site's router (RB2011 in this case) to grab a public IP similar
> to a DSL or cable connection.  Configuring a public subnet just to have an
> external IP on an internal router seems to add more administration than
> would be needed for 90% or more of the sites.  Having the firewall
> configurations being done/updated on a normal basis out at the
> antenna/metal means you have to GO to the antenns to reaet the router if
> there are and config snags (been there/done that).  Having the user-managed
> device be inside the building is a LOT more convenient when something goes
> TU and leaves the antenna router in a more static/stable condition.  Please
> keep me in the loop for what becomes the preferred config for this as I
> expect to have most of my sites in this situation.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Cory (NQ1E)" <cory at nq1e.hm>
> Date: 3/5/17 3:56 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Puget Sound Data Ring <psdr at hamwan.org>
> Cc: netops at hamwan.org
> Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] Metal 5SHPN Network Help
>
> Hi Kyle,
>
> It is possible to bridge your interfaces togtether so your internal router
> could request a DHCP lease from the sector.  However, we would prefer you
> avoided that.
>
> If you would like public IP addresses to use inside of your network, we
> can have a subnet of your desired size routed to your modem.
>
> For help configuring that, please either join us in the IRC chat room
> (#HamWAN on freenode) or email the ops team directly at: netops at hamwan.org
>
> Good luck!
>
> -Cory
> NQ1E
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Kyle Burgess <kd7iyt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to figure out the best way to configure my Metal 5SHPn so it
>> acts like a bridge.  However, I want to try and do it in a way where it
>> won't disrupt the ability to remotely manage the radio (so the HamWAN team
>> can still access it if need be).
>>
>> Ultimately, I would like to have the HamWAN assigned IP handed off to a
>> dedicated interface on my router, just like what your typical ISP would
>> do.  That way I can handle any additional routing or NAT via my router, and
>> not on the radio itself.
>>
>> Any thoughts on the best way to go about that?  Would I just simply
>> switch the wireless mode from "station" to "station bridge"?  Or would
>> there be more involved to do that?
>>
>> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kyle Burgess
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PSDR mailing list
>> PSDR at hamwan.org
>> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20170305/13ffd503/attachment.html>