[HamWAN PSDR] Local Rings vs System Ring
Bart Kus
me at bartk.us
Sun Jul 15 15:24:32 PDT 2018
The ring is not so much of a ring
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_topology#Ring> anymore, it's more
of a mesh network topology
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_topology#Mesh> in reality. It
contains several rings (cycles
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_%28graph_theory%29>) inside the
mesh (graph). The HamWAN cell sites offer a standardized network
interface (frequencies, bearings, polarizations, bandwidths,
modulations, tdma, dhcp, ip). What you do with that is entirely up to
you. You can connect to any number of sites at once (including multiple
sectors at once at each site, and the OPP
<https://hamwan.org/Labs/Open%20Peering%20Policy.html> offering), and
have your own private networking in between the routers that interface
to HamWAN sites. You're not limited to using ring topologies in your
own networks either.
In short, yes, everything you're talking about is fine and doable.
--Bart
On 7/15/2018 2:49 PM, Jamie Hughes wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> Since there is some chatter about support emergency communications
> stuff, I’d like to ask some questions as well.
>
> Would it make sense to build a small “private” ring that then has a
> few connection points to a few “cell” sites? IN other words, create a
> private ring, between all the locations my team needs, and then at a
> few of those sites, hoping on to the Ham Wan.
>
> The goal would be to use all HAM WAN Routing, but remaining in the
> local ring unless we needed to route externally.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jamie Hughes
>
> WA7JH
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20180715/6ec92d99/attachment.html>
More information about the PSDR
mailing list