[HamWAN PSDR] Ok, my numbers
Bart Kus
me at bartk.us
Sat Nov 2 08:30:54 PDT 2019
If it's a pre-wired unit like the DynaDish 5, you can't change
polarities. Will just need to live with the confusion.
That is pretty bad upload performance. It could use some spectral
analysis on the HamWAN side, and perhaps testing with another client on
the same sector to find the cause. I hope it wasn't caused by the 10MHz
bandwidth change!
I don't have time to address this right now, so hopefully someone else
can step in.
The download numbers look fine though.
--Bart
On 11/1/2019 8:22 PM, Scott Currie wrote:
> So, it's not clear to me how to change the polarity on the channels.
> I'll do some reading. It's a DynaDish 5.
>
> These numbers look low, I may not be doing this right:
>
> /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.197 duration=30s direction=transmit
> status: running
> duration: 29s
> tx-current: 11.9kbps
> tx-10-second-average: 11.9kbps
> tx-total-average: 25.7kbps
> random-data: no
> direction: transmit
> tx-size: 1500
> connection-count: 20
> local-cpu-load: 4%
>
> /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.197 duration=30s direction=receive
> status: running
> duration: 29s
> rx-current: 12.8Mbps
> rx-10-second-average: 12.2Mbps
> rx-total-average: 12.0Mbps
> lost-packets: 1192
> random-data: no
> direction: receive
> rx-size: 1500
> connection-count: 20
> local-cpu-load: 16%
>
> -Scott
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:06 PM Bart Kus <me at bartk.us
> <mailto:me at bartk.us>> wrote:
>
> It appears you're connected to the Baldi site. That's probably
> the only site remaining that still doesn't have MIMO (2-chainz)
> modems. It only provides service with horizontally polarized signals.
>
> It looks like your modem's setup to receive HPol on ch1. HamWAN
> typically suggests HPol be wired to ch0, and all our network gear
> follows that standard:
>
> http://hamwan.org/Standards/Component%20Engineering/Client%20Hardware.html
>
> It makes troubleshooting easier when there's a clear
> polarity-to-chain mapping.
>
> I'm also not sure why we're still running that sector at 5MHz
> bandwidth, it should be 10MHz. I've gone ahead and updated the
> sector's config to be 10MHz. This should provide you with a bit
> more speed, at the cost of 3dB of signal power, which you can
> afford given your -66dBm link.
>
> Feel free to run some bandwidth-tests to Baldi-S3.hamwan.net
> <http://Baldi-S3.hamwan.net> (44.24.240.197) to confirm performance.
>
> PS: The "tx-signal-strength-ch0" is reported back to you from
> Baldi-S3 (how well it hears you), since Baldi-S3 only has a ch0,
> even though that's not your tx-ch0, but rather your tx-ch1 that
> it's measuring. You see how confusing things get when polarities
> are flipped? :)
>
> --Bart
>
>
> On 11/1/2019 7:46 PM, Scott Currie wrote:
>> So, should I be concerned about my ch0 numbers?
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> [ns7c at WA7AUB-Baldi] > /interface wireless monitor 0
>> status: connected-to-ess
>> channel: 5880/5/an
>> wireless-protocol: nv2
>> tx-rate: 6.5Mbps-5MHz/1S
>> rx-rate: 13Mbps-5MHz/1S
>> ssid: HamWAN
>> bssid: D4:CA:6D:7A:A3:EF
>> radio-name: N7FSP/Baldi-S3
>> signal-strength: -66dBm
>> signal-strength-ch0: -90dBm
>> signal-strength-ch1: -66dBm
>> tx-signal-strength: -67dBm
>> tx-signal-strength-ch0: -67dBm
>> noise-floor: -101dBm
>> signal-to-noise: 35dB
>> tx-ccq: 47%
>> rx-ccq: 79%
>> authenticated-clients: 1
>> current-distance: 31
>> wds-link: no
>> bridge: no
>> routeros-version: 6.41.3
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PSDR mailing list
>> PSDR at hamwan.org <mailto:PSDR at hamwan.org>
>> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>
>
>
> --
> */-Scott/*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20191102/25278491/attachment.html>
More information about the PSDR
mailing list