[HamWAN PSDR] Site details?

Fri Mar 17 23:00:40 PDT 2023

I ditto the point that you must see line of sight to connect at this 6GHz 
connection frequency reliably.  Use a telescope if needed. If you have a 
single tree in the way, not worth investing $$ on the equipment. I had to 
dodge a single cedar tree.by mounting my dish on a 6ft mast on the 
Ridgeline of my house at a single specific location.

IF you're on flat land or a boat on the sea, it's 13mi to rhe Horizon.  If 
the Tx antenna is on a tower above ground it helps extend that distance.  
If the tower is on a mountain it helps.  Same for Rx antenna.  But you're 
talking 28mi, more than twice that flat distance to the horizon. It's 
possible, based on relative height AGL on both ends, but if there's no 
*VISIBLE* LOS, I would not blindly place my money on that craps table 
number no matter what topo RF software says.  The beam width is so wide at 
that distance that 30deg variance of the sector node from relative north 
bearings is not going to make much difference.  Borrow a telescope and 
sight it on a clear day like I did.  Which is another matter, as I've seen 
signal degrade with weather just a couple miles away from a sector node, 
imagine 28mi with rain.  If you can't see it for the trees, install a tower 
and repeat the telescope sighting from its top.  If you still can't see it, 
figure out a way for you or the HamWAN folks into installing another sector 
node on a hill top closer to you, as everyone wants to expand the network.

Stephen W9SK

On March 17, 2023 5:34:59 PM "Nick Kartsioukas" <nick at explodinglemur.org> 
wrote:

> I can see nothing from my roof.  From my original mail, "For example it 
> looks like I "only" need a 35' mast for Baldi, but at 28mi away I'm not 
> sure I can get connected reliably, vs Beacon or Capitol Park which are much 
> closer but I'd need at least a 66' mast thanks to local terrain and trees." 
>  Local terrain and trees are a challenge here which is why I want to gather 
> and simulate as much as I can before I try to do something that a 
> simulation would rule out.
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 22:17, Tom Hayward wrote:
>> I can appreciate the desire to play around with the mapping tools and
>> coverage models. I have done a lot of that myself.
>>
>> We've found that the most reliable predictor of coverage, aside from an
>> RF survey, is a pair of binoculars. Can you see the tower while
>> standing on your roof?
>>
>> Tom KD7LXL
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, 21:17 Nick Kartsioukas <nick at explodinglemur.org> wrote:
>>> Because I enjoy playing around with radio coverage mapping tools and want 
>>> to have the closest representation of reality?
>>> I'm in an exceptionally non-optimal area for PSDR, so I want to have as 
>>> much information as I can about required mast height and link budget for 
>>> each site before I go actually installing anything.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 15:45, Stephen Kangas wrote:
>>> > Nick, I'm not certain why precision matters here.  My experience
>>> > working with Bart & Doug assisting them putting up the Rattlesnake Mtn
>>> > sector is that they may deviate from the exact bearing only to provide
>>> > better coverage to the area below, avoiding obstacles and focusing on
>>> > the user community.  We're not talking really narrow beams here.  You
>>> > should be able to expect that if there is a sector antenna pointed to
>>> > your area that it is optimized for your chances of connection
>>> > regardless of how precise the sector antennas matches 0deg N bearing
>>> > offsets.
>>> >
>>> > FWIW, Stephen W9SK
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: PSDR <psdr-bounces at hamwan.org> On Behalf Of Carl Leon
>>> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 3:16 PM
>>> > To: 'Puget Sound Data Ring' <psdr at hamwan.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] Site details?
>>> >
>>> > Those are the standard. I think there is one single sector site where
>>> > that varies, but am not certain.
>>> > Carl, N7KUW
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: PSDR <psdr-bounces at hamwan.org> On Behalf Of Nick Kartsioukas
>>> > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2023 9:51 AM
>>> > To: psdr at hamwan.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] Site details?
>>> >
>>> > Sorry, I phrased that part poorly.  Are all sectors aligned at
>>> > 0/120/240 when present, or do they deviate from those bearings?
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 08:26, Doug Kingston wrote:
>>> >> Not all the cell sites have every sector.  If a cell site is on the
>>> >> side of a hill or has a large obstruction immediately adjacent, we
>>> >> omit the sector facing into the obstruction as it would not serve any
>>> >> useful purpose.
>>> >> We have tried to depict the available sector in the map on the
>>> >> website, but you may need to zoom in to see that detail.  If you have
>>> >> questions about particular sites, Feel free to contact me directly
>>> >> (dpk at randomnotes.org) or mail the netops@ list or ask on our IRC
>>> >> channel.
>>> >>
>>> >> -Doug-
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:15 PM Nick Kartsioukas
>>> >> <nick at explodinglemur.org> wrote:
>>> >>> I've been able to find location info for most of the PSDR sites and 
>>> antenna height info for some of them.  Do they all have sectors pointing 
>>> 0/120/240 degrees relative to north?  Is there anywhere that has EIRP info? 
>>>  I'm trying to see how tall a mast I need to get connected, and whether or 
>>> not I can even make link for some of the sites.  For example it looks like 
>>> I "only" need a 35' mast for Baldi, but at 28mi away I'm not sure I can get 
>>> connected reliably, vs Beacon or Capitol Park which are much closer but I'd 
>>> need at least a 66' mast thanks to local terrain and trees.
>>> >>> At the moment I'm using https://ispdesign.ui.com/ (which now has LIDAR 
>>> data for buildings/trees!) and have also used RadioMobile Deluxe in the past.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks!
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> PSDR mailing list
>>> >>> PSDR at hamwan.org
>>> >>> https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> PSDR mailing list
>>> >> PSDR at hamwan.org
>>> >> https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > PSDR mailing list
>>> > PSDR at hamwan.org
>>> > https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > PSDR mailing list
>>> > PSDR at hamwan.org
>>> > https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > PSDR mailing list
>>> > PSDR at hamwan.org
>>> > https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PSDR mailing list
>>> PSDR at hamwan.org
>>> https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>> _______________________________________________
>> PSDR mailing list
>> PSDR at hamwan.org
>> https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> https://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail01.fmt.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20230317/03206589/attachment.html>