[HamWAN PSDR] Ok, my numbers
Scott Currie
scott.d.currie at gmail.com
Sun Nov 3 08:57:22 PST 2019
I am still seeing slow TX speeds when I run the test from the client end.
Am I doing something wrong? Wrong IP?
/tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.197 duration=30s direction=transmit
status: running
duration: 29s
tx-current: 11.9kbps
tx-10-second-average: 11.9kbps
tx-total-average: 41.1kbps
random-data: no
direction: transmit
tx-size: 1500
connection-count: 20
local-cpu-load: 4%
[ns7c at WA7AUB-Baldi] > /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.197 duration=30s
direction=receive
status: running
duration: 29s
rx-current: 13.1Mbps
rx-10-second-average: 14.4Mbps
rx-total-average: 13.4Mbps
lost-packets: 1439
random-data: no
direction: receive
rx-size: 1500
connection-count: 20
local-cpu-load: 12%
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 9:41 AM Tom Hayward <tom at tomh.us> wrote:
> His speeds look fine today.
>
> [tom at Baldi-S3] > /ip dhcp-server lease print
>
> Flags: *X* - disabled, *R* - radius, *D* - dynamic, *B* - blocked
>
> * # ADDRESS
> MAC-ADDRESS HOST-NAME SERVER
> RATE-LIMIT STATUS *
>
> 0 *D* 44.24.240.252 64:D1:54:AD:8C:13
> W7CLO-Baldi dhcp1
> bound
>
> 1 *D* 44.24.240.251 CC:2D:E0:1E:DE:C7
> WA7AUB-Baldi dhcp1
> bound
>
> [tom at Baldi-S3] > /in wi registration-table print
>
> * # INTERFACE
> RADIO-NAME MAC-ADDRESS
> AP SIGNAL-STRENGTH TX-RATE UPTIME *
>
> 0 wlan1-gateway
> W7CLO/Enumcla...
> 64:D1:54:AD:8C:13 no -70dBm 29.2... 13h34m40s
>
> 1 wlan1-gateway
> WA7AUB/Auburn...
> CC:2D:E0:1E:DE:C7 no -73dBm 29.2... 13h34m40s
>
> [tom at Baldi-S3] > /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.251 duration=10
>
> status: done testing
>
> duration: 10s
>
> rx-current: 14.8Mbps
>
> rx-10-second-average: 14.0Mbps
>
> rx-total-average: 14.0Mbps
>
> lost-packets: 0
>
> random-data: no
>
> direction: receive
>
> rx-size: 1500
>
>
> [tom at Baldi-S3] > /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.251 duration=10 direction
> =transmit
>
> status: done testing
>
> duration: 11s
>
> tx-current: 14.2Mbps
>
> tx-10-second-average: 12.8Mbps
>
> tx-total-average: 12.8Mbps
>
> random-data: no
>
> direction: transmit
>
> tx-size: 1500
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Bart Kus <me at bartk.us> wrote:
>
>> If it's a pre-wired unit like the DynaDish 5, you can't change
>> polarities. Will just need to live with the confusion.
>>
>> That is pretty bad upload performance. It could use some spectral
>> analysis on the HamWAN side, and perhaps testing with another client on the
>> same sector to find the cause. I hope it wasn't caused by the 10MHz
>> bandwidth change!
>>
>> I don't have time to address this right now, so hopefully someone else
>> can step in.
>>
>> The download numbers look fine though.
>>
>> --Bart
>>
>>
>> On 11/1/2019 8:22 PM, Scott Currie wrote:
>>
>> So, it's not clear to me how to change the polarity on the channels. I'll
>> do some reading. It's a DynaDish 5.
>>
>> These numbers look low, I may not be doing this right:
>>
>> /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.197 duration=30s direction=transmit
>> status: running
>> duration: 29s
>> tx-current: 11.9kbps
>> tx-10-second-average: 11.9kbps
>> tx-total-average: 25.7kbps
>> random-data: no
>> direction: transmit
>> tx-size: 1500
>> connection-count: 20
>> local-cpu-load: 4%
>>
>> /tool bandwidth-test 44.24.240.197 duration=30s direction=receive
>> status: running
>> duration: 29s
>> rx-current: 12.8Mbps
>> rx-10-second-average: 12.2Mbps
>> rx-total-average: 12.0Mbps
>> lost-packets: 1192
>> random-data: no
>> direction: receive
>> rx-size: 1500
>> connection-count: 20
>> local-cpu-load: 16%
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:06 PM Bart Kus <me at bartk.us> wrote:
>>
>>> It appears you're connected to the Baldi site. That's probably the only
>>> site remaining that still doesn't have MIMO (2-chainz) modems. It only
>>> provides service with horizontally polarized signals.
>>>
>>> It looks like your modem's setup to receive HPol on ch1. HamWAN
>>> typically suggests HPol be wired to ch0, and all our network gear follows
>>> that standard:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://hamwan.org/Standards/Component%20Engineering/Client%20Hardware.html
>>>
>>> It makes troubleshooting easier when there's a clear polarity-to-chain
>>> mapping.
>>>
>>> I'm also not sure why we're still running that sector at 5MHz bandwidth,
>>> it should be 10MHz. I've gone ahead and updated the sector's config to be
>>> 10MHz. This should provide you with a bit more speed, at the cost of 3dB
>>> of signal power, which you can afford given your -66dBm link.
>>>
>>> Feel free to run some bandwidth-tests to Baldi-S3.hamwan.net
>>> (44.24.240.197) to confirm performance.
>>>
>>> PS: The "tx-signal-strength-ch0" is reported back to you from Baldi-S3
>>> (how well it hears you), since Baldi-S3 only has a ch0, even though that's
>>> not your tx-ch0, but rather your tx-ch1 that it's measuring. You see how
>>> confusing things get when polarities are flipped? :)
>>>
>>> --Bart
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/1/2019 7:46 PM, Scott Currie wrote:
>>>
>>> So, should I be concerned about my ch0 numbers?
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>>
>>> [ns7c at WA7AUB-Baldi] > /interface wireless monitor 0
>>> status: connected-to-ess
>>> channel: 5880/5/an
>>> wireless-protocol: nv2
>>> tx-rate: 6.5Mbps-5MHz/1S
>>> rx-rate: 13Mbps-5MHz/1S
>>> ssid: HamWAN
>>> bssid: D4:CA:6D:7A:A3:EF
>>> radio-name: N7FSP/Baldi-S3
>>> signal-strength: -66dBm
>>> signal-strength-ch0: -90dBm
>>> signal-strength-ch1: -66dBm
>>> tx-signal-strength: -67dBm
>>> tx-signal-strength-ch0: -67dBm
>>> noise-floor: -101dBm
>>> signal-to-noise: 35dB
>>> tx-ccq: 47%
>>> rx-ccq: 79%
>>> authenticated-clients: 1
>>> current-distance: 31
>>> wds-link: no
>>> bridge: no
>>> routeros-version: 6.41.3
>>> --
>>> Sent from my mobile device...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PSDR mailing listPSDR at hamwan.orghttp://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> *-Scott*
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PSDR mailing list
>> PSDR at hamwan.org
>> http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
>>
>
--
*-Scott*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20191103/171fec46/attachment.html>
More information about the PSDR
mailing list