[HamWAN PSDR] VOTE: Blyn HamWAN Site

[John C. Miller]

Just to clarify:  Sector 3 is nominally pointed Southwest / 240 degrees, is that correct?



I would counter with the following regarding sector 3 on Blyn:



1) The users that we *would* potentially have in this sector 3 region might well be the ones who have the fewest (or no) other connectivity options.  They also might be the most isolated in certain types of disasters, which would only amplify the usefulness and public service dimension of providing this coverage.



2) The incremental cost in terms of time and $$$ to add that third sector,  versus just deploying 2 sectors, mitigates in favor of deploying Sector 3 now.



John KX7JM










---- On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:16:22 -0700 Kenny Richards <richark at gmail.com> wrote ----



On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:01 PM Tom Hayward <mailto:tom at tomh.us> wrote:




On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:47 AM Bart Kus <mailto:me at bartk.us> wrote:

It covers Port Angeles.




We should plan to fudge the azimuth slightly to optimize Port Angeles.






Could we fudge S1 and S2, then not need a S3?



Sorry to keep pushing this point, but that is a huge area of space which is not likely to have many users.




Thanks

Kenny



_______________________________________________
 PSDR mailing list
 mailto:PSDR at hamwan.org
 http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr



_______________________________________________

PSDR mailing list

mailto:PSDR at hamwan.org

http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20200625/a232ef79/attachment.html>