[HamWAN PSDR] system usage

[Cory (NQ1E)]

Seattle MeshNet is not an amateur radio project and is strictly part15.
 That network would not be a likely peer for HamWAN.

You may be confusing that with NW-MESH which is a recently popular
ham-based project in the Seattle area.  NW-MESH would be a perfect
candidate for peering with HamWAN.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NW-MESH/
http://nw-mesh.wikidot.com/



On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Rob Salsgiver <rob at quailsoftltd.net> wrote:

> Ok….. time for more questions, now that the marathon meeting is over <g>.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> A number of times I’ve heard potential uses that seem to blur the line
> between amateur and commercial, so my question is – how do we draw the line?
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> As an example – connecting to the Seattle MeshNet.  As I read it, the
> MeshNet is non-amateur.  Are we looking to be a generic carrier grade ISP?
> If so, then this will work, but we won’t be able to use amateur frequencies
> to do it.  Similar question for connecting firehalls down south – if we are
> sticking to strictly amateur uses, then the usage by laptops and other
> devices at a firehall would be limited to amateur related uses – i.e. – no
> non-hams using it.****
>
> ** **
>
> It may be that I’m just missing a big concept here, but I see a lot of
> blurring of the lines in conversation, and I think it needs to be better
> spelled out before we get in front of too many folks.****
>
> ** **
>
> I’ll stop with this one for now, rather than continue to show my ignorance
> and unfamiliarity <g>.****
>
> ** **
>
> Rob****
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSDR mailing list
> PSDR at hamwan.org
> http://mail.hamwan.org/mailman/listinfo/psdr_hamwan.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20130213/09b46ff6/attachment.html>