[HamWAN PSDR] Newbie

[Phil Cornell]

This discussion of encryption is all very interesting but I think we got off track here.  I was asking for help with setting up a new link.  Right now it looks like the Thurston County EOC is questionable due to some trees blocking the view of Capital Peak from the parking lot.  We need to see this view from the tower or building roof and that won't be happening anytime soon.  My Plan C, ("A" was at my house, "B" was at the EOC) is to install it at Crawford Peak, just outside of the town of Rainier, and connect it to a new Fusion capable UHF repeater(OARS 441.400 pl103.5) and link to Capital Peak from there.  That will require a lot of permissions, politics, and persistence.  It will require working with TCOMM-911(building/tower owner), DNR(site manager), and Thurston County Sheriff(lease holder), the IT/Radio tech for TCOMM is very interested so this may be easier than expected.
More details to follow.

Phil Cornell  
 W7PLC 
SHARES NCS590
Hybrid Gateway W7PLC
TCARES  VP





 

    On Friday, March 19, 2021, 12:00:10 PM PDT, psdr-request at hamwan.org <psdr-request at hamwan.org> wrote:  
 
 Send PSDR mailing list submissions to
    psdr at hamwan.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    psdr-request at hamwan.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    psdr-owner at hamwan.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of PSDR digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. Encryption is (can be) Legal (Donald Rotolo)

Hello,

  

To amplify Kevin’s comment below: 

  

In a conversation several years ago with Riley Hollingsworth, then the FCC’s enforcement guy, he emphasized to me that “obscuring the meaning” was not allowed, but encryption for other purposes was perfectly acceptable. I even wrote about it (“Encryption is Legal”, August 2006) in CQ Magazine (google it, it’ll come up somewhere).

  

Granted, Riley is no longer with the FCC. But authentication != obscuring meaning, and lawyers focus on the meaning of the words as written. And, if it is not prohibited, it is allowed.

  

So it all comes down to the purpose of the encryption, right?  Purpose is obscuring meaning = Not allowed. Purpose is other, allowed.

  

73, Don N2IRZ

  

From: Kevin Walsh [mailto:w8khw1 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 6:09 PM
To: Puget Sound Data Ring <psdr at hamwan.org>
Subject: Re: [HamWAN PSDR] Newbie

  



Hello,

  

The word encryption never appears in Part 97 rules, so its definition is irrelevant here. The key words in the rule are “intent” and “obscure”.  So for instance, two people speaking pig-Latin with the intent of obscuring their conversation violate the same rule and the conversation is prohibited - even though it’s not encrypted.

  

If I may, another option would be to get any of your associated Public Safety agencies to in part sponsor HamWan. Public Safety was granted access to the “special” Amateur Radio portion of 5.8GHz years ago and they CAN use (and in my state require) secure communication. Then you’re operating under Part 15 and the conversation is moot.

  

https://www.fcc.gov/public-safety/public-safety-and-homeland-security/policy-and-licensing-division/public-safety-spectrum

  

Just food for thought, I’ll go back to lurking now :-).

  

73, 

  

Kevin

W8KHW 




_______________________________________________
PSDR mailing list
PSDR at hamwan.org
http://mail.hamwan.net/mailman/listinfo/psdr
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.hamwan.net/pipermail/psdr/attachments/20210319/071c7823/attachment.html>